Re: No misdirected 'vacation' messages
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:11:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4.2.0.58.J.20040205150806.07515238@localhost> |
At 08:26 04/02/05 -0800, [email protected] wrote: >On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Martin Duerst wrote: > > > - Users want both their and other people's absence/vacation messages > > to go to the right place (e.g. original sender of a mail rather than > > a whole mailing list). > >This is too specific for user goals. Why? It may be a minor goal, but I don't see why this can't be listed. >However > > - Users want to be able to specify (in standard way) information about >temporary and/or permanent changes to their email configuration and >timeframe for these changes This only speaks about the user who is on vacation. I was also speaking about other users, in particular those that send mail to users on vacation, or those that send mail to mailing lists with users on vacation. Regards, Martin. >This includes vacation messages with ability to specify when email needs >to be resend and email system could then do it automaticly then if user >allows it and if its within timeframe for delivery of that mail. > >Also if you change email, it would be nice if your old provider could >provide standard service to redirect to new email address. Then special >reply would be send and email could redelivered (I see it as special answer >during MAIL session transmission - i.e. actual email is not even sent to >the other end and there is no need for that end to try to forward it >which puts primary task on that forwarding server which is why many ISPs >choose to not forward emails for users that quit - its somewhat resource >consuming for them). Additionally it would allow for automated changed to >address book in case of changes to email address of your friends, etc. > >Additionally this can accomplish other changes such as that when mailbox >is almost full, the error reported could be that temporarily messages of >large size would not be accepted (and time specified is when some cleanup >program would run on the server). Knowing timeframe when the redelivery >should be attempted saves resources and extra connections in situations >like that. > >-- >William Leibzon >Elan Networks >[email protected]