Re: Some existing proposals for next-generation email

Len Sassaman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ng
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:

> So, let me say it again: this list is about determining the needs in
> new protocols, not fixing current ones.
>
> To re-cast what is said above in terms appropriate for this list:
> "the receiving user agents in the next-generation protocol should not
> lose messages just because the user hasn't checked in a while".

Hi Paul,

I do think it is worth while identifying major problems with existing mail
protocols, as a point of reference. Is that appropriate for the list?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.