Re: The need for two headers

Brett Watson <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:22:35 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ng
Organization PhD Student, Macquarie University
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 02:42, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> Be careful here.  If I send a message to multiple recipients at a given
> site, all as "Bcc:" or equivalent, I may not want all of the recipients to
> see the complete delivery path information if it's going to contain all of
> the recipient's addresses.  That would defeat the purpose of "Bcc:".

Mail goes from one sender to one or more recipients. You can think of the 
outgoing mail route as a tree, branching at certain points where mail is 
relayed or forwarded through different hosts. What I would intend to deliver 
to each recipient is information about the particular root-to-leaf path which 
reached them, not that of any other recipient. This means that each recipient 
gets a different bundle of delivery metadata, whereas they all get the same 
message metadata. That's one of the compelling reasons for keeping the two 
bundles separate in the first place: one is static, the other dynamic.

Regards,
TFBW