Re: The need for two headers
Brett Watson <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Feb 2004 03:22:35 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Organization | PhD Student, Macquarie University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 02:42, Steven F Siirila wrote: > Be careful here. If I send a message to multiple recipients at a given > site, all as "Bcc:" or equivalent, I may not want all of the recipients to > see the complete delivery path information if it's going to contain all of > the recipient's addresses. That would defeat the purpose of "Bcc:". Mail goes from one sender to one or more recipients. You can think of the outgoing mail route as a tree, branching at certain points where mail is relayed or forwarded through different hosts. What I would intend to deliver to each recipient is information about the particular root-to-leaf path which reached them, not that of any other recipient. This means that each recipient gets a different bundle of delivery metadata, whereas they all get the same message metadata. That's one of the compelling reasons for keeping the two bundles separate in the first place: one is static, the other dynamic. Regards, TFBW