Re: built-in spam burden & email privacy protection

At 2:01 PM -0800 2/9/04, Ed Gerck wrote:
>Clearly, a user requirement cannot be proposed if it's not possible.

True, and irrelevant. What you propose is clearly possible.

>My message points out a new possibility, allowing new -- and better--
>user requirements to be practically discussed.

Disagree. It is a proposal for how to do something without stating 
what the something is or whether it was a requirement or just a cute 
feature. Please refrain from that in the future. Thanks!

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium