Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop
Richard Welty <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:46:27 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Organization | Averill Park Networking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:54:37 -0800 Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> wrote: > This may or may not be controversial, but I propose that a > requirement for sane operations is that mail-ng be single hop. > Multi-hop was a good design 20 years ago when many entities were not > online all the time, but it has also proven to be a huge hurdle in > extending SMTP. hmmmm. there are various good reasons why an organization (corporation, school, government body) might want internal hops for outbound mail. if you mandate one hop from an originating administrative zone to a destination administrative zone, i could see that. i just think that both ends of the transaction need the flexibility to manage their internal infrastructure as they see fit. richard -- Richard Welty [email protected] Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592 Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security