Re: Why are we here? What are our goals?
"Eric A. Hall" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/29/2004 7:56 PM, Paul Lambert wrote: > Anonymous mail is a valuable service that should be provided by this > effort and not designed away in our fervor to eliminate spam. > > -- support for anonymous transport and anonymous headers I'm not exactly sure what it is that you're afraid of losing, but human anonymity is a function of the identifier-user mapping, and has nothing to do with the identifier itself. If you want to provide anonymity, all you really need to do is obscure the mapping and/or the user. It's also possible to obscure the identifier itself through one-time use. But in any event, it's entirely possible to have unspoofable identifiers that are also entirely anonymous at the same time. For example, you used [email protected] as the identifier for your message, and have also provided human identity mapping via your name and so forth. You could just as easily used a yahoo.com identifier, provided false or incomplete information, and then never use that identifier again. The only thing the transport would ever need to care about is that the identifier could be verified as valid (demonstrating that the sender was authorized to use it), which has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the human identity behind the identifier. In fact, it would be entirely feasible to generate and use brand-new, one-time identifiers for each and every message to achieve complete anonymity. Remailers could extend on that with dump-and-pump sinks that absorb mail on input and generate one-time identitifies on output. The only thing the recipients could tell was that the messages came from that remailer, and that the sender was authorized by the remailer to use the identifier they presented, but nothing more. None of this has anything whatsoever to do with anonymity. There is no need or reason to allow for spoofing when anonymity can be retained in tighter models. The only real limits to anonymity are laws that require otherwise. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/