Re: Less is more

At 20:57 27/04/04 +0100, Mike Higginbottom wrote:

>On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:40:13 -0400, Keith Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>I'm not sure what mail-ng could do to solve those problems while still
>>retaining a useful date field.
>
>How about a single restricted format selected from the somewhat excessive
>range offered by ISO8601 e.g. 2004-04-27T20:55:00+0100

Maybe this is really off-topic, too detailed for the intended debate of 
this list, but since it seems it won't fade away I feel I must just mention:
   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact