Re: decodeBase64() input need not be NUL-terminated [patch]

Ken wrote:

> >Change decodeBase64() to accept a length for the encoded string and
> >not assume it is NUL-terminated.
>
> I took a look at this and it makes sense to me.  Does anyone object
> if I commit it?

No objection.  Thanks, Stephen.  I'm glad to see this kind of change.

David