Re: decodeBase64() input need not be NUL-terminated [patch]

> Ken wrote:
>
> > >Change decodeBase64() to accept a length for the encoded string and
> > >not assume it is NUL-terminated.
> >
> > I took a look at this and it makes sense to me.  Does anyone object
> > if I commit it?

Ken, I went ahead and committed Stephen's patch.

Stephen, thank you for the patch, and especially for your analysis and explanation supporting it.

David