Re: decodeBase64() input need not be NUL-terminated [patch]

>> > >Change decodeBase64() to accept a length for the encoded string and
>> > >not assume it is NUL-terminated.
>> >
>> > I took a look at this and it makes sense to me.  Does anyone object
>> > if I commit it?
>
>Ken, I went ahead and committed Stephen's patch.
>
>Stephen, thank you for the patch, and especially for your analysis and
>explanation supporting it.

Thanks!  My apologies for dropping the ball on this; "life happened".  Sigh.

--Ken