"pick" but across multiple folders

George Michaelson <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2026 11:52:07 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.mail.nmh.devel
Message-ID <CAM2GGynDtQq6ukz9taTYsNTDfpDRjgun1sTq1fnMxxfJWL_t8Q@mail.gmail.com>
--000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I can do a for ... done loop over the folders by name, but I wondered if
there was some better way to achieve what pick does, but across more than
one folder. the "folders" command has -recurse so the idea "there is more
than one folder" exists but it doesnt look like pick is aware of more than
one folder, to construct its sequence. And a sequence itself is folder
specific so this would require more than one sequence as an outcome anyway.
which is .. what my for loop does.

I recall a bunch of people doing free text search methods, back before
google was a thing. I don't think a good single candidate emerged, but I am
sure by now the praxis has moved on.

-G

--000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I can do a for ... done loop over the folders by name, but=
 I wondered if there was some better way to achieve what pick does, but acr=
oss more than one folder. the &quot;folders&quot; command has -recurse so t=
he idea &quot;there is more than one folder&quot; exists but it doesnt=C2=
=A0look like pick is aware of more than one folder, to construct its sequen=
ce. And a sequence itself is folder specific so this would require more tha=
n one sequence as an outcome anyway. which is .. what my for loop does.<div=
><br></div><div>I recall a bunch of people doing free text search methods, =
back before google was a thing. I don&#39;t think a good single candidate e=
merged, but I am sure by now the praxis has moved on.</div><div><br></div><=
div>-G</div></div>

--000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb--