"pick" but across multiple folders
George Michaelson <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2026 11:52:07 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.nmh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM2GGynDtQq6ukz9taTYsNTDfpDRjgun1sTq1fnMxxfJWL_t8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I can do a for ... done loop over the folders by name, but I wondered if there was some better way to achieve what pick does, but across more than one folder. the "folders" command has -recurse so the idea "there is more than one folder" exists but it doesnt look like pick is aware of more than one folder, to construct its sequence. And a sequence itself is folder specific so this would require more than one sequence as an outcome anyway. which is .. what my for loop does. I recall a bunch of people doing free text search methods, back before google was a thing. I don't think a good single candidate emerged, but I am sure by now the praxis has moved on. -G --000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">I can do a for ... done loop over the folders by name, but= I wondered if there was some better way to achieve what pick does, but acr= oss more than one folder. the "folders" command has -recurse so t= he idea "there is more than one folder" exists but it doesnt=C2= =A0look like pick is aware of more than one folder, to construct its sequen= ce. And a sequence itself is folder specific so this would require more tha= n one sequence as an outcome anyway. which is .. what my for loop does.<div= ><br></div><div>I recall a bunch of people doing free text search methods, = back before google was a thing. I don't think a good single candidate e= merged, but I am sure by now the praxis has moved on.</div><div><br></div><= div>-G</div></div> --000000000000ee7ba10647ae6cfb--