Re: [patch] Re: Why does sortm treat sorting empty folders as an error?

chaw wrote:

> Following an earlier suggestion, I am attaching a patch that adds -empty
> and (the default) -noempty switches to sortm.

Great!  The patch itself is perfect.  It just needs an update to the the s=
ortm man page.  Would you mind updating your patch with that?

Thank you for your contribution, especially including the test case!

As far as test-mhical goes, that test is a bit sensitive.  If you have a c=
hance to track down the issue, that would be great.  Or at least post the =
message that it prints upon failure.

David