Re: Perdition make error

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:31:55AM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
> Am 2010-06-01 08:17, schrieb Simon Horman:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:24:41PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
> >    
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> We are using perdition 1.17.1 on Centos 5.3 x64.
> >> I tried to use the CentOS repo for updating to 1.18 but that version
> >> dies immediately after a imap4 connect with "Exit 11" -
> >> as we are using ldap as database I thing that is related to that patch
> >>
> >> http://hg.vergenet.net/perdition/perdition/rev/28264fe9e31b
> >>
> >> so I tried to compile perdition 1.18 manually.
> >> That fails with:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DPERDITION_LIBDIR=\"/opt/perdition180/lib\"
> >> -DPERDITION_SYSCONFDIR=\"/opt/perdition180/etc/perdition\"
> >> -DPERDITION_LOCALSTATEDIR=\"/opt/perdition180/var\" -I/usr/include
> >> -g -O2 -MT perdition.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/perdition.Tpo -c -o perdition.o
> >> perdition.c
> >> perdition.c: In function »main«:
> >> perdition.c:547: Warning: Zuweisung erzeugt Zeiger von Ganzzahl ohne
> >> Typkonvertierung
> >> perdition.c:712: Fehler: expected expression before »else«
> >> perdition.c:950: Fehler: expected expression before »else«
> >> perdition.c:998: Fehler: expected expression before »else«
> >> make[3]: *** [perdition.o] Fehler 1
> >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/perdition-1.18/perdition'
> >> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
> >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/perdition-1.18/perdition'
> >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Fehler 1
> >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/perdition-1.18'
> >> make: *** [all] Fehler 2
> >>
> >> Can somebody give me a hint please?
> >>      
> > Strange. Are you sure that the source hasn't been mangled somehow?
> > How did you obtain the code?
> >
> >
> >    
> Hello Simon!
> 
> Thank you for your reply!
> Thats my source: 
> http://www.vergenet.net/linux/perdition/download/1.18/perdition-1.18.tar.gz
> 
> I tried the mentioned ldap patch and I got an error and I downloaded and 
> extracted the source
> again and tried it without the ldap patch ... same problem.
> 
> May it be related to a CentOS 5.3 (64bit) problem?

Possibly. Could you send me a copy of your perdition.c file as
an attachment? Off-list is fine.

> Or - another solution for us ... do you plan to integrate the patch in 
> the CentOS RPMs?
> (we use ldap as database and need the mailhost field ...)

Yes, but it may be faster for you to sort the build problem out.
______________________________________________
Perdition-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users