Re: Port logging
Simon Horman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.perdition.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:59:01AM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 02:40:16PM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: > > > > Since I'm on the subject of logging... > > > > I notice that even if I am coming in on port 993, the port field that is > > logged is the port of the outgoing connection: > > > > Apr 4 11:19:24 auk perdition[19421]: Auth: 0.0.0.0->0.0.0.0 ---- server="0.0.0.0" port="143" status="ok" > > > > In this case, my incoming imap connection was an imaps (993) connection > > to perdition, it then looked up my user and found the server to connect > > to, and then made the connection to that server over port 143. I > > expected it to connect to the remote server over 143, but I was > > expecting to get a log entry from perdition that the port it received > > the connection on is port 993. > > > > Is there a way to get a log entry that indicates the incoming port > > number, as well as the outgoing one? > > Fixes for that are also in the changes that I need to merge (ASAP!). Hi Micah, these changes have been merged and are included in 1.19~rc1, which is now in sid. ______________________________________________ Perdition-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users