Re: Thunderbird 3.1 SSL/TLS Renegotiation
Simon Horman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.perdition.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:44:45PM +0200, John Feuerstein wrote: [snip] > > Fatal Error reading authentication information from client > > 192.168.10.100:34680->192.168.10.100:143: Exiting child > > ... I also get this on each login using Thunderbird 3.1.1. > However, this doesn't seem "fatal" to the real IMAP session. > It seems like TB opens an additional connection to the server to check > capatibilities, then closes it without sending any authentication. The > authentication is then done on the initial connection (probably after > STARTTLS...) instead. > > The debug log confirms this (PID 6245 is this mysterious connection that > just sends nothing (EOF?) after capability, while PID 6243 is the > initial connection that continues just fine...): > > > perdition.imap4[6243]: Connect: 192.168.10.100:34679->192.168.10.100:143· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1 STARTTLS] perdition ready on 0N\030\303\377\177 000297fe\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: Connect: 192.168.10.100:34680->192.168.10.100:143· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: SELF: "* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1 STARTTLS] perdition ready on 0N\030\303\377\177 000297fe\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: CLIENT: "1 STARTTLS\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: SELF: "1 OK Begin TLS negotiation now\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: CLIENT: "1 STARTTLS\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "1 OK Begin TLS negotiation now\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SSL connection using CAMELLIA256-SHA· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: SSL connection using CAMELLIA256-SHA· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: CLIENT: "2 capability\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "2 OK CAPABILITY\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: CLIENT: "2 capability\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: SELF: "* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: SELF: "2 OK CAPABILITY\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: CLIENT: "4 login \"[email protected]\" \"foobar\"\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: username_add_domain: username_add_domain 0 1· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: username_add_domain: username_add_domain 0 4· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: CLIENT: ""· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: token_read: token_fill_buffer· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: read_line: token_read· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: imap4_in_get_auth: read_imap4_line 1· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: main: protocol->in_get_auth· > > perdition.imap4[6245]: Fatal Error reading authentication information from client 192.168.10.100:34680->192.168.10.100:143: Exiting child· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "* OK IMAP4 Ready 10.10.4.4 0001ce47\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "flim07 CAPABILITY\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4REV1 STARTTLS\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "flim07 OK CAPABILITY\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "flim08 LOGIN {15}\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "+ OK ready for additional input\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "[email protected] {10}\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "+ OK ready for additional input\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "foobar\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: REAL: "flim08 OK SUCCESS - REAL MAIL SERVICE\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: SELF: "4 OK SUCCESS - PROXY\r\n"· > > perdition.imap4[6243]: Auth: 192.168.10.100:34679->192.168.10.100:143 client-secure=starttls authorisation_id=NONE authentication_id="[email protected]" server="127.0.0.1:10143" protocol=IMAP4 server-secure=plaintext status="ok"· > > ... > > ... so perhaps you can catch this in imap4_in_get_auth() or just leave > it this way. (After all, it's just TB trying to be smart...) Hi John, I agree with your analysis. What seems to be happening is that Thunderbird is closing a connection without issuing a LOGOUT, command and perdition is complaining about that. I think that is is worth fixing perdition so that it doesn't complain here. But the fix is non-trival, so I think it is post 1.19 material. ______________________________________________ Perdition-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users