Re: perdition + imapproxyd
scott hollatz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.perdition.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Hi. > > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 16:17 +0200, Matthias Leopold wrote: > > hi, > > > > are there any issues when using imapproxyd in front of a perdition server? > > > > thx > > matthias > > > > It should work fine, I used the combination for several years in a quite > busy environment (up to thousands of simultaneous sessions) without any > problems. We've been using this combination for years, too, on four webmail systems, each having over a thousand simultaneous connects. > Best regards, > > Janne Pikkarainen -- scott hollatz net [email protected] information technology systems and services tel +1 218 726 8851 university of minnesota duluth mn usa fax +1 218 726 7674 -- "Asn aD ta zlAp em uT zt33rg" ______________________________________________ Perdition-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 185 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (SunOS) iD8DBQFMiky44og1WWfEVRsRAvVuAKCSVDmBAL6q9O67oSUGf+/Tmtse/ACfdhrF NM8q8VhznY3ecw1PDZm0hNk= =tyjW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----