perdition and IMAP COMPRESS (RfC 4978)
Sven Hartge <[email protected]> Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:21:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.perdition.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newsfeed am Wurmloch |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! I am in the planning stage for an upgrade of my employers mail system. In the backend I will be using dovecot which supports IMAP COMPRESS <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4978.txt>, <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Compress>. In the frontend I would like to continue using perdition. From the RfC I assume, perdition should cope with IMAP COMPRESS, since everything after a successful authentication is just passed through. From the RfC: ,---- | The following example illustrates how commands and responses are | compressed during a simple login sequence: | | S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 STARTTLS COMPRESS=DEFLATE] | C: a starttls | S: a OK TLS active | | From this point on, everything is encrypted. | | C: b login arnt tnra | S: b OK Logged in as arnt | C: c compress deflate | S: d OK DEFLATE active | | From this point on, everything is compressed before being | encrypted. `---- Is my assumption correct that it is safe to use perdition in such a setup? Or am I threading on thin ice here, bound for disaster? Grüße, Sven. -- Sig lost. Core dumped. ______________________________________________ Perdition-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.vergenet.net/listinfo/perdition-users