Re: pine, and x509 certificates
Kolbjørn Barmen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Kolbjørn Barmen dixit: > > >On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: > > > >> It appears to me that pine doesnt respect DNS entries in "X509v3 Subject > >> Alternative Name" in certificates on validation, instead it just complains > >> that CN doesnt match. > >> > >> Am I correct, and if so.. will it be fixed? > > > >I havent seen any reply on this, consider this a reminder :) > > I haven't seen the original mail. > > Well, I tried to implement it in Lynx, but adding support for > multiple CNs in the DN is *much* easier and works in more > places anyway so I suggest to use that in your certs instead. Only they are not _my_ certificates, they are certificates that are installed on various IMAP and SMTP servers that I use. Other clients have no problems with them, so why should pine? -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info