Re: Re: pine, and x509 certificates (fwd)

We agree, and alternative names will be supported in the next release of 
Pine.

If you like, you can get this support by rebuilding Pine 4.64, replacing 
the existing pine4.64/imap tree with the imap-2006 development snapshot on
 	ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/imap-2006.DEV.tar.Z

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Kolbj$Bx(Brn Barmen dixit:
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Kolbj$Bx(Brn Barmen wrote:
>>> It appears to me that pine doesnt respect DNS entries in "X509v3 
>>> Subject Alternative Name" in certificates on validation, instead it 
>>> just complains that CN doesnt match.
>>> Am I correct, and if so.. will it be fixed?
>> I havent seen any reply on this, consider this a reminder :)
> I haven't seen the original mail.
> Well, I tried to implement it in Lynx, but adding support for
> multiple CNs in the DN is *much* easier and works in more
> places anyway so I suggest to use that in your certs instead.
> Only they are not _my_ certificates, they are certificates that are
> installed on various IMAP and SMTP servers that I use. Other clients have
> no problems with them, so why should pine?

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info