Re: Re: pine, and x509 certificates (fwd)

Mark Crispin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.pine.general
Organization Networks & Distributed Computing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Do you have versioned, non-vanishing (i.e. archived) files there of
> imap versions deemed stable which people can just plug into their
> pine port?

In general, you should use the IMAP version that was bundled with Pine.

Occasionally, a newer development snapshot will build with the release 
version of Pine and you may want to do this to get something new in the 
newer IMAP software.  But that's the exception to the general rule, and 
you don't want to do that unless you have a good reason.  Development 
snapshots, by definition, are not stable.

IMAP releases are released in lockstep with Pine releases, and that has 
been the case for the past several years.  You can count upon that being 
the same.

So, for Pine 4.64 (current release), either use the bundled imap-2004g 
(current release) or you can try a development snapshot of imap-2006.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.