Re: Using TAB to check for new messages

Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.pine.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
*** Tim K. (Gmane) ([email protected]) wrote in the pine-info...:

:) The problem I'm having is that when I hit TAB while viewing the default 
:) inbox, sometimes pine detects recent messages in the other incoming 
:) folders, other times it doesn't (and it seems to favor not detecting 
:) recent messages!).
:) 
:) This feature seems to be very unreliable, unless there are some options 
:) that I can tweak to make it work better. I definitely do not want the 
:) option "tab-uses-unseen-for-next-folder" as I usually keep messages 
:) marked as New in my inboxes.

Tim,

  Do you use the IMAPSTATUS token in the index-format?. If not, make sure 
you use it.

  A recent message is marked as "N" or "R", while and unseen message is 
marked as "U" when you use IMAPSTATUS. If you have never tweaked the 
index-format variable, then both recent and unseen messages are marked as 
"N". This will only lead you to confusion.

  If you use tab-uses-unseen-for-next-folder, then Pine will open the next 
folder if there are unseen (but maybe none recent) messages. If you only 
want to use tab to check for recent messages, then unset this feature. The 
down side, though, is that since Pine keeps (a certain number of) streams 
open then Pine keeps those imap folders open.  The down side of this 
method is the following situation:

  * You open a folder in an IMAP server,
  * You (believe that you) close that folder
  * While the folder is "closed", a new message arrives
  * You quit Pine or at least 25 minutes have elapsed since the last time 
    you closed this folder.

Under this sequence of events, the next time (you open Pine and) you open 
that IMAP folder, the "new" messages will be tagged UNSEEN, because they 
are not recent anymore. A message can only be recent on one session, and 
that one is the one that you thought you had closed, but Pine did not.

  If you want to avoid this problem, set the variable 
max-remote-connections to 0 (zero). The help text makes me believe that 
this may not work fully, but I believe it will work if your inbox and this 
folder are in different servers. The help text is not clear about how 
setting the max-remoe-connection value to zero may fail in this situation.

  Does this help?

-- 
Eduardo
Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml
Please send spam to webmaster@localhost

_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.