Re: getross - email privacy /security of system

Bert Driehuis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.pine.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Ryan Barrett wrote:

> wow, is that true? i'd meant that they'd need to include encryption, PGP
> style, in their base installs. outlook and thunderbird already do that?!? or
> do you just mean there are plugins available?

At least a few of these products have some flavor of S/MIME or some such 
on board. All based on some flavor of hierarchical X.509 certificates; 
not PGP-style peer certificates.

Trying to get it to work is about as much fun a getting a root canal 
treatment. For example, getting one combination of Outlook/Exchange to 
talk to another version of Outlook/Exchange can be a challenge; I've 
seen instances where the receiving Exchange stripped the cryptographic 
signature; I've seen other instances of the message being eaten 
altogether. The user was completely in the dark in both cases, and 
tracing the logs I could see it happening but I'm in the dark as to what 
caused it to this day.

Finding a certificate authority with clean hands is another challenge. 
Would you trust one who takes $35 out of your credit card, then claims 
the transaction fails, holds you ransom until you pay another $35, and 
subsequently runs you in circles when you try to get your money back?

PGP is great. Unfortunately, IMHO the old PGP was greater than the 
subsequent PGP and when I had to maintain multiple copies of PGP with 
radically different command lines just to decrypt older stuff I sort of 
gave up. The teething pains of GPG are less pronounced but I still 
haven't come round to switching (which is a good thing, because my usage 
was in fact affected by the barn-door sized bug that was fixed 
recently, if I understood the announcement correctly).

Crypto is not for the faint of heart. And end-users, by and large, have 
more trust in the authorities than they have in technology, and much as 
I distrust some authorities, the above examples do point out that the 
technosceptical users do have an point that's rooted in fact.

Cheers,

 				-- Bert
_______________________________________________
Pine-info mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.