Computed list of destinations?
R P Herrold <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.procmail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, udi M wrote: > On 08/09/15 20:49, R P Herrold wrote: > The absence of explicit loops does not mean you cannot > 'munged' a X header inside an email, and then send the result > back into the top of the procmail process by simply re-sending > to your self, of course > Sending the message to yourself is B A DÂ idea! and I did not recommend it, but rather pointed out that with some mungeing, it was less dangerous that 'B A D'. The '-p option' for post-processing a corpus, piece by piece requires the same loop avoidance alertness as may be -- but the nice thing about a Unix-like environment with adequate fork and pipe facilities, is that one can have a powerful enough tool to shoot oneself in the foot, if that is your wish. It is easy enough, with the sub-shell examples provided by me, to consult a translate function, or pre-computed table of recipients (single or multiple), and then feed that result into the disposition phase. I used delivering recipies, but re-mailing ones are easy enough to drop in -- Russ herrold