Re: State of procmail [was Re: Is this the official procmail list?]

On 17/08/16 02:47, John Levine wrote:
>> I do not understand the problem.   The mime headers are plain-text, ther=
e is
>> no problem regarding to procmail recipes.
> It would be nice if procmail's regexes could match the text inside
> MIME-encoded headers.

I agree with you, big help.

>    And it would also be nice if there were some
> way to tell it to look for particular kinds of body parts and look
> inside the contents.

In the context of the headers I would be more careful because of the bad
people in the network and because of the instability standard

Before I handle mime I change all the types from
    Multipart/Alternatives    to    Alternative/mixed
it works beautiful.

--udi

>
> R's,
> John
> ____________________________________________________________
> procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail