Re: Where is the qmail Licence?

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:01:22AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Andy Jackman <[email protected]> wrote: [snip mostly valid points] 
> > More importantly, I understand that if he fails to take action against
> > people to appear to have violated his licence (like plisk) then he is in
> > fact showing that their actions are not illegal and are in fact a valid
> > interpretation of the licence. 
> 
> That is not a valid assumption; copyright is not abandoned in this way as
> trademarks are.  djb would have to make an explicit statement to grant you any
> rights that the law does not already give you.

which he refuses to do...

Kind Regards,
Frank Louwers

-- 
Openminds bvba                www.openminds.be
Tweebruggenstraat 16  -  9000 Gent  -  Belgium