Re: Where is the qmail Licence?

Andy Jackman <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:48:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.dist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>> That is transferring a modified binary of qmail...

I disagree.
1) If you act as the employee/agent/contractor for the recipient then
you are not 'transfering'. So as long as somewhere in my terms and
conditions I inform the buyer that I am acting on their behalf when I
install and patch qmail, then I am not transfering.
2) Anyway, transfering is not banned by djb's conditions. Distribution
is. And since he doesn't define distribution then it's undefined until a
court decides what he means by it. Maybe they would take the dictionary
definition, maybe they would take the industry definition, maybe they
would make up their own based on a synthesis of these. Either way, until
a court or djb rules that moving a machine with his binary on it is
'distribution', then it isn't. 

-- Andy

Charles Cazabon wrote:
> 
> Toni Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > If I understand *you* correctly, selling an appliance type of box with
> > some qmail+patch(es) preinstalled would be ok
> 
> No, that is /not/ okay.  That is transferring a modified binary of qmail from
> you to someone else.  That's distribution of modified binaries, and is
> forbidden by djb.
> 
> This really is quite simple.
> 
> Charles
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Charles Cazabon                        <[email protected]>
> GPL'ed software available at:     http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------