Re: Where is the qmail Licence?
Andy Jackman <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:48:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.dist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> That is transferring a modified binary of qmail... I disagree. 1) If you act as the employee/agent/contractor for the recipient then you are not 'transfering'. So as long as somewhere in my terms and conditions I inform the buyer that I am acting on their behalf when I install and patch qmail, then I am not transfering. 2) Anyway, transfering is not banned by djb's conditions. Distribution is. And since he doesn't define distribution then it's undefined until a court decides what he means by it. Maybe they would take the dictionary definition, maybe they would take the industry definition, maybe they would make up their own based on a synthesis of these. Either way, until a court or djb rules that moving a machine with his binary on it is 'distribution', then it isn't. -- Andy Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Toni Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If I understand *you* correctly, selling an appliance type of box with > > some qmail+patch(es) preinstalled would be ok > > No, that is /not/ okay. That is transferring a modified binary of qmail from > you to someone else. That's distribution of modified binaries, and is > forbidden by djb. > > This really is quite simple. > > Charles > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> > GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/ > -----------------------------------------------------------------------