Re: Where is the qmail Licence?

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Andy Jackman wrote:
> Since all this sums up to the fact that djb's 'licence' appears to
> toothless, it lead me to seek clarification as to what the actual
> licence is. More importantly, I understand that if he fails to take
> action against people to appear to have violated his licence (like
> plisk) then he is in fact showing that their actions are not illegal and
> are in fact a valid interpretation of the licence. 

I don't think you can make that statement, since you have no information
about Dan's business relationship with Plesk.  They may have paid him a 
license fee, for all you know.

--Adam