Re: fastforward etc and binary dist (Re: errno-patch (Re: Email servers))

On Fri, 09.01.2004 at 12:00:36 -0800, Adam McKenna <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:00:09PM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote:
> > What if I'm an OS vendor, and don't want or need sendmail compatibility? 
> > Presumably Dan believes vanilla qmail configuration is superior to 
> > /etc/aliases/.forward - why foist the inferior version on the masses?
> http://cr.yp.to/compatibility.html

Fortunately he wasn't as compatibility-happy when he made djbdns, or we
would still be fighting BIND zone files. If anyone finds a statement
about distributing that on his site other than softwarelaw.html, I'm
very interested.


Best,
--Toni++