Re: distributing source

Frank Louwers <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:38:36 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.dist
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:32:53AM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Frank Louwers wrote:
> 
> > technicly, it could be considered 'distributing' for the clients boxes.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > My question is quite simpel: am I allowed to do what I intended or do I
> > realy have to build these packages on every single machine?
> 
> I would have thought that the answer was obvious.

You mean i have to rebuild these packages on every machine? That's quite
stupid? I understand the logic behind "you can't distribute (ie: make
public) modified binary packages", but what you are saying is "you can't
transfer and install binary packages to machines that aren't your own,
even if you are the only admin on them".

Now what if I leased my own servers instead of buying them? Technicly,
the leasing company owns my servers untill they are fully paid for. Does
that mean I can't install a binary package on them as well?


Kind Regards,
Frank Louwers

-- 
Openminds bvba                www.openminds.be
Tweebruggenstraat 16  -  9000 Gent  -  Belgium