Re: distributing source
Frank Louwers <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:01:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.dist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:50:56AM -0500, Charlie Brady wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Frank Louwers wrote: > > > What is a "standard binary qmail package"? > > Read DJB's explicit definition. url? Afaik, there is no explicit definition of the terms: - distributing - modified - standard binary qmail package Do you have a URL? > > My "modified" stuff doesn't need to modify the source (except for "the > > filesystem synchronous mount" thingie), > > That's modifying the source. I would consider that change optional. Well, it is needed on most systems, but that's a detail... > > > If you are saying that if I don't modify the source (the > > .c,.h,Makefiles/whatever), but modify the install scripts, the default > > config files etc, I can still "distribute" my package to the servers I > > admin, then you've made me a very man. > > "a very man"? I guess. a very happy man. To resume, to the best of your knowledge, if I: - don't modify the source files - but do modify the config files (/var/qmail/control/*, the tcpserver config scripts, the start/stop/logging scripts) - make a binary debian package of that - put that somewhere on one server, not publicly available Then I am allowed to install that binary package on all servers I admin, even if I am not the owner of the box. > I con't tell you what you can do or not do. DJB already has. Well, DJB left some details not very clear, and doesn't seem to answer mails. Kind Regards, Frank Louwers -- Openminds bvba www.openminds.be Tweebruggenstraat 16 - 9000 Gent - Belgium