Re: distributing source
Russell Nelson <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:52:29 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.dist |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] writes: > I do not think so: installing on clients' machines is not considered > (strictly) distribution. You have two options: As a practical matter, it is extremely difficult to detect this sort of copyright violation. Dan's copyright can be effective at achieving its aims even if Frank copies a binary package from his machine to a customer's machine. What he mostly wants to make sure is that there is no wholesale distribution of modified versions of his software. Since he can pick and choose who he sues for copyright violation, he need only sue the wholesalers, leaving people like Frank (and myself) free to do what we want. -- -russ nelson http://russnelson.com | You can ignore economics, Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | but economics isn't going 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | to ignore you. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX |