Re: Netqmail vs qmail

I run fedora servers and am willing to setup test servers with sqmail ... i 
keep them up to date to the latestg OS's (which is somewhat dangerous but fun 
to keep ahead of, currently on core 23) ... so if you want i can try to keep 
sqmail as my default MTA? LMK

Kirk



On 1/26/2016 2:08 PM, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> try to consider my s/qmail (http://www.fehcom.de/sqmail.html) instead.
>
> It is build for FreeBSD.
> The qmail code is aging.
> netqmail is just a work around without solving the relevant issues.
>
> regards.
> --eh.
>
>
> Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de | PGP Key-Id: EE00CF65
>
>
>
>
>
>> Am 26.01.2016 um 19:27 schrieb Bill Olson <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>
>> Hello,
>> My name is Bill Olson and I have been using qmail for about 11+ years now. 
>> I have had my own guide onfreebsdrocks.net <http://freebsdrocks.net/>which 
>> I have been keeping up to date every few months.
>> I seem to be having an issue with applying John Simpsons patch with 
>> netqmail. I have found through trial and error that qmail and netqmail do 
>> not co-exist peacefully. I have learned that netqmail is what is now 
>> recommended but I have a few issues with this. Please excuse my ignorance 
>> as I am **very** new to netqmail. What I have done to make netqmail work on 
>> Freebsd is downloading netqmail 1.06 along with 
>> roberto-netqmail-1.06.patch-latest. I cannot recall if I added John 
>> Simpsons validrcptto’s patch before or after but qmail **apprears** to be 
>> working. My issue is when I send via SSL I get an error 256. If I run the 
>> install of the qmail port and run a make install it starts working. I am 
>> using John Simpsons qmail-smtp-run scripts on qmail.
>> I also have an intermittent issue with TLS. Does TLS with netqmail work out 
>> of the box? Are there are specific instructions setup to enable TLS on 
>> netqmail?
>> If someone can point me to relevant information on how to get John Simpsons 
>> patch working with netqmail … I would be so happy.
>> Thank you for your time.
>> Bill Olson
>