Re: Netqmail vs qmail

Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:32:03 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.qmail.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Bill (+ all others),

s/qmail ist basically qmail but with a lot of enhancements. I thought to have explained those on my web site.

What is included:

- AMD64
- IPv6
- TLS
- Auth
- Recipient verification
- ....

And no, no patches yet. In particular I'm not interested to include bloated functionality and STDIO program pieces.
Unfortunately, the docs are not yet finished, but what you are looking for is already explained:

http://fehcom.de/sqmail/sqmaildoc_04.html


Simply, give it a try!

regards.
--eh.





> Am 27.01.2016 um 18:59 schrieb Bill Olson <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Well I don’t see anything on that page about using another patch. What patch does this use? The reason I ask is if I use John Simpsons patch at https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml <https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml> I won’t get his features like validrcptto (which is awesome) and other settings. How do your run files differ from his? Have you used John’s scripts before?
> 
> Bill Olson
> 
> 
Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de <http://www.fehcom.de/> | PGP Key-Id: EE00CF65

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)