Re: Identifying used patches
Jens Bauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ed. Thank you for the quick answer and suggestions. Note: I am already running qmail; I still have the binaries running, but I need to make it work with debian.org. I do not have the recipe for re-building the exact same version of qmail that I have currently running. Can you confirm that John's patch is the *only* patch supporting DENY_TLS and ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH and REQUIRE_AUTH ? If 7.10 is the one I already have installed, then it will not help me installing it again, because it already has the ANY-to-CNAME patch. -So if that's what I have installed already, then the problem is elsewhere. Anyone wanting to test if their qmail works with debian.org and lists.debian.org could try writing a small test e-mail to the debian-user list-bot: To: List Bot <[email protected]> Subject: Hello Nice weather. I'm just testing my MTA. (I get a response if I send the message via telnet, but if I send it through qmail-smtpd, it never leaves my server). If noone can get a reply from the above mentioned list-bot, I think we might have a bug to find and fix. Love Jens On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 08:52:07 +0000, ed wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 03:26:57AM +0100, Jens Bauer wrote: >> "SMTP Protocol Error: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of >> allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1)" > >> I am denying any authorization/authentication on port 25. >> I require secure authorization/authentication on port 587. > >> My actual question is: >> Which patch(es) use "ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH", "DENY_TLS" and "REQUIRE_AUTH" ? >> >> Normally, I would only apply a minimum set of patches, which means >> I'm not likely to use a "combined patch". >> Is it *only* the patches from John M. Simpson, or are there others too ? >> -A lot of arrows point in that direction, which means that I might >> have stopped rolling my own recipe and used John's patches with my >> own RCPTCHECK added (I would expect that John's patch would include >> the "ANY DNS" patch, though). > > From what you've said above, I would suggest you get the latest (7.10) > combined patch[1] and install from his instructions using the various > run scripts[2]. > > 1: <https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml> > 2: <https://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/> > > Surprisingly (or not so) that combined set has served me well. The only > change I've added is some TLS options to prevent SSL2[3]. > > 3: <https://www.usenix.org.uk/content/qmail.html> > > Using John's patches will at least get you a good stable system with > minimal effort. > > -- > Best regards, > Ed http://www.s5h.net/ >