Re: Identifying used patches

Jens Bauer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Ed.

Thank you for the quick answer and suggestions.

Note: I am already running qmail; I still have the binaries running, but I need to make it work with debian.org.
I do not have the recipe for re-building the exact same version of qmail that I have currently running.

Can you confirm that John's patch is the *only* patch supporting DENY_TLS and ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH and REQUIRE_AUTH ?

If 7.10 is the one I already have installed, then it will not help me installing it again, because it already has the ANY-to-CNAME patch.
-So if that's what I have installed already, then the problem is elsewhere.

Anyone wanting to test if their qmail works with debian.org and lists.debian.org could try writing a small test e-mail to the debian-user list-bot:

To: List Bot <[email protected]>
Subject: Hello
Nice weather. I'm just testing my MTA.

(I get a response if I send the message via telnet, but if I send it through qmail-smtpd, it never leaves my server).
If noone can get a reply from the above mentioned list-bot, I think we might have a bug to find and fix.


Love
Jens

On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 08:52:07 +0000, ed wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 03:26:57AM +0100, Jens Bauer wrote:
>> "SMTP Protocol Error: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of 
>> allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1)"
> 
>> I am denying any authorization/authentication on port 25.
>> I require secure authorization/authentication on port 587.
> 
>> My actual question is:
>> Which patch(es) use "ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH", "DENY_TLS" and "REQUIRE_AUTH" ?
>> 
>> Normally, I would only apply a minimum set of patches, which means 
>> I'm not likely to use a "combined patch".
>> Is it *only* the patches from John M. Simpson, or are there others too ?
>> -A lot of arrows point in that direction, which means that I might 
>> have stopped rolling my own recipe and used John's patches with my 
>> own RCPTCHECK added (I would expect that John's patch would include 
>> the "ANY DNS" patch, though).
> 
> From what you've said above, I would suggest you get the latest (7.10) 
> combined patch[1] and install from his instructions using the various 
> run scripts[2].
> 
>   1: <https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml>
>   2: <https://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/>
> 
> Surprisingly (or not so) that combined set has served me well. The only 
> change I've added is some TLS options to prevent SSL2[3].
> 
>   3: <https://www.usenix.org.uk/content/qmail.html>
> 
> Using John's patches will at least get you a good stable system with 
> minimal effort.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Ed http://www.s5h.net/
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.