Re: Identifying used patches
"Andy Bradford" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thus said Jens Bauer on Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:06:14 +0100: > (I get a response if I send the message via telnet, but if I send it > through qmail-smtpd, it never leaves my server). What do your logs say? When I send an email to [email protected] I see the following in my logs: 2016-03-26 11:35:20.319739500 delivery 21223: deferral: 82.195.75.100_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said:_450_4.2.0_<[email protected]>:_Recipient_address_rejected:_Greylisted,_see_http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/lists.debian.org.html/Giving_up_on_82.195.75.100./ Which tells me that they are using some kind of grey listing. Eventually, this email should be delivered when qmail retries delivery. I'm confused though, how did you pass the grey listing test using just telnet? Did you try more than once? Did you see the above temporary failure error with telnet? My email does eventually make it: 2016-03-26 11:41:52.917416500 delivery 21224: success: 82.195.75.100_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_Ok:_queued_as_6F22F0F/ And I have a mail in my inbox: Subject: Re: Hello From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:41:58 +0000 (UTC) If there is a bug, it's not in my qmail (mostly stock qmail with one or two patches at most). Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000056f6caa6