Re: Identifying used patches

Kristen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 3/26/16 12:52 AM, ed wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 03:26:57AM +0100, Jens Bauer wrote:
>> "SMTP Protocol Error: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of 
>> allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1)"
> 
>> I am denying any authorization/authentication on port 25.
>> I require secure authorization/authentication on port 587.
> 
>> My actual question is:
>> Which patch(es) use "ALLOW_INSECURE_AUTH", "DENY_TLS" and "REQUIRE_AUTH" ?
>>
>> Normally, I would only apply a minimum set of patches, which means I'm not likely to use a "combined patch".
>> Is it *only* the patches from John M. Simpson, or are there others too ?
>> -A lot of arrows point in that direction, which means that I might have stopped rolling my own recipe and used John's patches with my own RCPTCHECK added (I would expect that John's patch would include the "ANY DNS" patch, though).
> 
> From what you've said above, I would suggest you get the latest (7.10) 
> combined patch[1] and install from his instructions using the various 
> run scripts[2].
> 
>   1: <https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml>
>   2: <https://qmail.jms1.net/scripts/>
> 
> Surprisingly (or not so) that combined set has served me well. The only 
> change I've added is some TLS options to prevent SSL2[3].
> 
>   3: <https://www.usenix.org.uk/content/qmail.html>
> 
> Using John's patches will at least get you a good stable system with 
> minimal effort.
> 

Jens,

I will voice my support of Jim Simpson's patches. I use these alone and
I have an almost spam free server. The system is solid and is easy to build.

I know you want to repair your system first. I did send an email to the
debian list as requested. First it was greylisted, then accepted. I am
on some debian mail list (Debian-PPC, Debian-Women) but not the one you
are subscribe to.

Best of luck

Kristen
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 204 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlb3CfcACgkQF1wXlvLxlNgnbwCgn5o9Dg/5qX56nt572v8aoO1d
7n0AnRti+/tdHB9qgoMt2jJSWzmmZQQk
=wmnG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.