Re: eQmail or s/qmail

On 2016-04-22 17:24, Webservice wrote:
> I really like the eQmail-package, and certainly it's style.
:-)

> We are certainly looking to use Qmail for just MTA, other things can be
> better done with specialized programs.
That's exactly the way I prefer.

> The only thing I "miss" is SRS.
> We patched two servers once, but on both qmail-local occasionly 
> crashed.
> I never had time to investigate it further, so we don't use it for now.
> However this still breaks SPF and so causing bad reputation for our
> outgoing SMTP-servers.
> I don't see an SRS-patch in eQmail nor s/qmail.
> It is in indimail-mta, but to me indimail depends a little bit to much
> on rpm's. Building Indimail ourself is patching again, and that's what
> we don't want anymore.
> 
> 
> Are there plans for an SRS-patch in eQmail or s/qmail?
It is not necessary to patch eQmail. SRS can be implemented like I do in 
my qmail-xdkim package through the API's. As I said already, there 
should be no need to patch eQmail to add a functionality anymore.

Unfortunately there is no ready-to-use plugin yet. Wouldn't it be a task 
for somebody to create such a package?

Kai
----
Sent with eQmail-1.10-dev