Re: Benchmarked tcpserver dlopen() -> qmail_smtpd() VS tcpserver --> fork() --> exec qmail-smtpd

Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Apr 2017 00:15:52 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,


> Am 05.04.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Manvendra Bhangui <[email protected]>:
> 
> When I went live, the stock qmail was
> just not able to handle the deluge of emails. We had around 3 million
> customers. The first thing I did was to put multiple queues (instead
> of just one /var/qmail/queue).

Yes, the funny 'Silly Qmail Syndrom'. André tried to overcome this; me too with a different approach.

Anyway, the current store&forward paradigm of emails needs to be redesigned. To put everything on disk and to look THEN who is going to potentially receive the message might no be a clever choice (greetings to IM2000 -;)) in our current 'messaging' world.

Regards.
--eh.



Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de | PGP Key-Id: EE00CF65
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=7S9n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----