Re: Qmail & Qmail-LDAP future
Manvendra Bhangui <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:55:23 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOqj+1OOufdiB9G7b7=idZPjpQ_4tV85Ze-6=NDxwwzA54yZMQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 21:23, Carlos García Gómez <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear colleagues of QMAIL and QMAIL-LDAP > > I have a very stable Qmail-LDAP solution for more than 10 years. > I have HW balancer with Qmail-cluster (N nodes) > The fact is that I think that this project is discontinued and it seems a pity. > Qmail is the best MTA there is but his design, in my opinion, is pretty bad. This was compensated with LDAP, which provides us with all user management in a flexible and powerful DB. Not sure what you mean by bad? IMHO, the design has been excellent and extremely small code footprint, which makes it easy to add new features. > > > The problem is that if there is not a Qmail-LDAP continuity project and updated patches, I do not see any future. > I am worried that in the future some kind of vulnerability will appear and that there is no solution. > For example, I don´t have any solution for submission implementation, DKIM, etc. to be integrated with Qmail-LDAP > I am not sure if you are looking at a change just because of DKIM. The DKIM solution listed in your link below is mine. It consists of two executables qmail-dkim (which can be called by setting QMAILQUEUE environment variable) and dkim (which is used primarily for testing). You can integrate with qmail-ldap, netqmail, etc. I have seen other solutions which involve simple perl scripts too. The DKIM patch for netqmail can be dowloaded from https://sourceforge.net/projects/indimail/files/netqmail-addons/qmail-dkim-1.0/dkim-netqmail-1.06.patch-1.23.gz > I thinking to change to Qmail –> Netqmail –> https://notes.sagredo.eu/en/qmail-notes-185/patching-qmail-82.html and I would not like it because for example I would have to use vpopmail again (Software discontinued too since 2011) > > What’s your opinion? Unless something is broken, you should stick to your current setup. Else try out the solutions by Roberto Puzzanghera, Erwin Hoffman's build or mine (indimail). You can decide which works best for you. -- Regards Manvendra - http://www.indimail.org GPG Pub Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC7CBC760014D250C