Re: Qmail & Qmail-LDAP future

HI Carlos,



> Am 27.09.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Carlos García Gómez <[email protected]>:
> 
> Dear colleagues of QMAIL and QMAIL-LDAP
>  
> I have a very stable Qmail-LDAP solution for more than 10 years.
> I have HW balancer with Qmail-cluster (N nodes)
> The fact is that I think that this project is discontinued and it seems a pity.
> Qmail is the best MTA there is but his design, in my opinion, is pretty bad. This was compensated with LDAP, which provides us with all user management in a flexible and powerful DB.
>  
> The problem is that if there is not a Qmail-LDAP continuity project and updated patches, I do not see any future.
> I am worried that in the future some kind of vulnerability will appear and that there is no solution.
> For example, I don´t have any solution for submission implementation, DKIM, etc. to be integrated with Qmail-LDAP

for submission and DKIM, several solutions do exist (including mine for Spamcontrol + s/qmail).

It would be helpful, if you simply qualify your requirements for qmail as an MTA. I'm 100% sure, that other users will have different requirements. 

Regards.
--eh. 



>  
> I thinking to change to Qmail –> Netqmail –> https://notes.sagredo.eu/en/qmail-notes-185/patching-qmail-82.html and I would not like it because for example I would have to use vpopmail again (Software discontinued too since 2011)
>  
> What’s your opinion?
>  
> Regards
>  
> Carlos
>   Murcia – Spain

Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de | PGP Key-Id 7E4034BE