Re: Refreshing qmail server
Oliver Welter <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Dec 2018 12:35:44 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Pascal, All, just another question - are you still using vpopmail or is there another way to get virtual users working more "elegant" with qmail? I use dovecot with mysql for IMAP so this part is all set, I "just" need a tool to route the mails and alias stuff based on some SQL tables. I am not afraid to write some scripts to resolve directory path / redirects from user names but to be honest I dont get the idea how routing is done in qmail atm. best regards Oliver Am 29.11.18 um 13:41 schrieb Pascal Nobus: > A point of view from a user. > > I had the same problem: several Qmail-servers with a couple of thousand > users. > Changing towards Postfix or Exim was not really an option because we > have a backoffice build on .qmail-files, some scripts that where > activated when mail was send to, mailinglists, (de-)activate autoreplys, > etc. > After my search I ended up with s/qmail, it worked exactly as I wanted it. > No patches where needed after a blank install, and we had modern things > like TLS, IPv6 and smtp-authentication. > For antispam I use a front-proxy (assp), which is more specialized in > all these rapidly changing techniques. > > The only thing I'm still missing is SRS. > > > For the rest: Install it, Configure it, and forget about it. > I've been running it for more then a year now without a single problem. > Thx Erwin! > > > > > > > > Op 29-11-18 om 12:55 schreef Manvendra Bhangui: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 00:06, Kai Peter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 2018-11-25 19:32, Oliver Welter wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Finally - some time there was an announcement that s/qmail and eQmail >>>> want to join forces - are there any news on this? >>> >>> Now, I was hoping that Erwin replies to this question - anyway. >>> >>> To be honest I couldn't say that aQmail will come out soon. To be more >>> honest I think it doesn't make sense to wait for it. May be it will or >>> it will not come out. >>> >>> IMHO there are the following alternatives: >>> >>> - eQmail 1.08.1 to 1.10 >>> - indimail >>> - s/qmail >>> >>> The order is alphabetical. Whatever you like and prefer. I couldn't say >>> a lot about s/qmail or inidmail. If they would fit my needs, I never >>> would have created eQmail. eQmail works perfect to me. But Erwin and >>> Manvendra would say the same ;-) >>> >> Exactly. Ultimately it will be the end-user who needs to decide what >> he/she is comfortable with. But one need to get hands dirty to figure >> that out. >> >> But It looks like there is just a tiny crowd left, who are still >> working with qmail/netqmail to add new features required in the >> current times. Erwin, Kai Peter, Amitai Schleier, Thibault Richards >> and myself. As far as indimail is concerned, it is a hobby for me. I >> keep on working on it because I love the way DJB coded qmail, >> ucsp-tcp, daemontools and all of his other works. Coding in djb style >> is lot of hard work, but fun. Even simple things like formatting >> strings is about carefully crafting together the fmt_str, fmt_ulong, >> etc instead of just one statement sprintf. You might have to put in >> few substdio_put statements instead of just one printf from the >> standard c library. But with substdio you know that your data has got >> out successfully (unlike printf). Maybe it is just me, but sprintf, >> printf are ugly. Arbitrary string lengths are ugly. I have seen >> Erwin's code and his code is also with lot of care like djb without >> arbitrary string lengths or variable sizes. s/qmail and eQmail are >> much smaller and simpler to install and maintain than indimail, while >> indimail has almost everything that I need to run and cater to large >> number of users, but it has far too many control files and environment >> variables to configure. qmailrocks has good documentation that any >> newbie can follow and set it up. Mostly you won't go wrong if you have >> simple needs and go with s/qmail, eQmail, qmailrocks or indimail-mta >> (a much smaller version of indimail). >> > -- Protect your environment - close windows and adopt a penguin!
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.1 KB) - not displayed