Re: s/qmail vs qmail with John Simpson's combined patch

On 2/6/19 8:18 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
> 
> NH> Currently in the process of replacing a server that was running qmail with
> NH> John Simpson's combined patch.
> 
> NH> As far as I can tell John's combined patch is no longer being maintained
> NH> https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml so I'm wondering
> NH> whether s/qmail would be a suitable replacement in terms of functionality
> NH> and management?
> 
> NH> We're currently using greylisting and on some sending IP addresses Bruce
> NH> Guenter's qmail-qfilter.
> 
> NH> Don't think there's anything else out of the ordinary in the run scripts.
> 
> No one have a view?

I meant to respond awhile ago so the prompt was worthwhile.

I've been evaluating s/qmail and so far it looks good.  Some features of 
the combined patch aren't available in s/qmail but of course there are 
other features unique to s/qmail.  In my case there has been enough 
similarity so far that it's been a fairly straightforward process.

If you haven't subscribed, there is a s/qmail mailing list.

-
John J.