Re: qmail-remote crashed.
Rejaine Silveira Monteiro <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:48:38 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMTrDfXfyyY1kWq9dikDab_47FkxVZODPL1jGA3jBPCxDk9Lgw@mail.gmail.com> |
well, after the certificates again, qmail stopped crashing .. however outlook.com now started to refuse messages with the error below: 104.47.2.36_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_451_4.7.500_= Server_busy._Please_try_again_later_from_[a.b.c.d]._(AS77712315)_[DB5EUR01F= T062.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com]/ at the moment I have more than 2 thousand messages in the queue giving this error ... I believe they are blocking the new IP address ... :( Em seg, 18 de fev de 2019 =C3=A0s 17:18, Rejaine Silveira Monteiro <[email protected]> escreveu: > > I just renamed *.pem only to take a test. > I created both certificates again and it's working fine now (the cert > files had been copied from an older server and with an older version > of OS and openssl) > > Em seg, 18 de fev de 2019 =C3=A0s 17:08, John Johnstone > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > > On 2/18/19 2:12 PM, Rejaine Silveira Monteiro wrote: > > > Hi , John J. > > > > > > I renamed all files * .pem, restart qmail, and all pending emails for > > > outlook.com were delivered. I'm still trying to understand what > > > happened ... I'll going to do a test generating the keys again (I > > > believe that the ones that were in use were only copied from the > > > previous server and not generated again) > > > > > > thanks! > > > > As many have often pointed out as well as John Simpson himself, having = a > > publicly facing mail server is a significant effort. At the time John'= s > > patch was maintained that was true and it's even more so today. Unless > > you are investing quite a bit of time with it, you'll be likely to have > > delivery problems at some point. As Erwin's suggestions may have given > > the hint to you, TLS today is a moving target for creating > > interoperability problems. > > > > clientcert.pem is for qmail-remote. servercert.pem is for qmail-smtpd > > so if that has also been renamed you have disabled TLS for qmail-smtpd = also. > > > > - > > John J. > > > > > > > Em seg, 18 de fev de 2019 =C3=A0s 15:33, John Johnstone > > > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > >> > > >> On 2/18/19 12:26 PM, Rejaine Silveira Monteiro wrote: > > >>> Helo Erwin > > >>> > > >>> I'm not using TLS and using qmail-1.03-jms1-7.10.patch (FORCE_TLS= =3D0 > > >>> and DENY_TLS=3D1) > > >> > > >> I can't offer much help with specific ideas for a solution but I can > > >> offer some advice about where not to look. > > >> > > >> In John Simpson's patch FORCE_TLS and DENY_TLS are only used by > > >> qmail-smtpd. They are not used elsewhere. > > >> > > >>> anyway, I created the tlsdestinations file as you indicated, but it > > >>> did not work. > > >>> > > >>> the only problem is with clients using mail.protection.outlook.com > > >>> > > >>> in the link below you can read that there may be problems with new > > >>> ips, due to some "policy reputation" stuff (our mta ip was changed > > >>> last nigth) and maybe that is why we can not send it there .. > > >>> > > >>> https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/office365/securitycompliance/remov= ing-a-user-domain-or-ip-address-from-a-block-list-after-sending-spam-email > > >> > > >> If there is a problem with your IP addresses or domain names being > > >> acceptable to Microsoft you will be seeing 4yz or 5yz SMTP reply err= ors > > >> returned by them to you. Those errors will be in your qmail-send lo= g > > >> files. Those problems wouldn't cause qmail-remote to crash. > > >> > > >>> I publish SPF, but not DMARC or DKIM ... so I guess I'll have to wa= it > > >>> a little longer .. > > >> > > >> Any changes with SPF, DKIM, etc will not make a difference with > > >> qmail-remote crashing. > > >> > > >> If you have /var/qmail/control/clientcert.pem you can rename that fi= le > > >> out of the way so that qmail-remote won't use it. It will effective= ly > > >> disable TLS for qmail-remote. Just be aware that without TLS you ma= y > > >> have delivery problems with certain destinations since some will onl= y > > >> accept mail transferred with TLS. > > >> > > >> - > > >> John J. > > > > > --=20 *Esta mensagem pode conter informa=C3=A7=C3=B5es confidenciais ou privilegi= adas,=20 sendo seu sigilo protegido por lei. Se voc=C3=AA n=C3=A3o for o destinat=C3= =A1rio ou a=20 pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, n=C3=A3o pode usar, copiar ou=20 divulgar as informa=C3=A7=C3=B5es nela contidas ou tomar qualquer a=C3=A7= =C3=A3o baseada nessas=20 informa=C3=A7=C3=B5es. Se voc=C3=AA recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por f= avor avise=20 imediatamente ao remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o.=20 Agradecemos sua coopera=C3=A7=C3=A3o.*