Re: AW: SENDERCHECK patch
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.ldap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steve wrote: >> I've written a small patch that extends the SENDERCHECK facility. It allows >> > the definition of SENDERCHECK="AUTH", besides the already existent STRICT > and LOOSE. > >> The behaviour of SENDERCHECK is the same, except that when set to "AUTH", >> > if the sender address is local, and is verified in LDAP, the server will > require that > >> the sender is authenticated. >> >> I have written this patch because of the increasing number of spambots >> > forging valid local addresses. Many times using the same sender as the > recipient. > > > Is it possible to activate this feature based on the SENDERDOMAIN ? > I have some Domains where a the local adresses are often forged but i also > have some where it's necessary > to use the local address as sender . > > Hello Steve, Could you elaborate a bit more? maybe with an example.. R's Hugo Monteiro. -- ci.fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature Hugo Monteiro Email : [email protected] Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307 Web : http://hmonteiro.net Centro de Informática Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Quinta da Torre 2829-516 Caparica Portugal Telefone: +351 212948596 Fax: +351 212948548 www.ci.fct.unl.pt [email protected] ci.fct.unl.pt:~# _