Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

Carlos García Gómez <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.ldap
Organization Fundación Integra
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hugo,

I am agree.

I am using qmail-ldap since four years ago.
many thousands of mailboxes (maildirs)
three servers hight Availability.
All open source.

All is running. no problem.

Regards

Carlos
 Murcia
  Spain


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hugo Monteiro" <[email protected]>
To: "Scott Ryan" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Qmail-ldap list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP


> On 02/03/2010 06:15 AM, Scott Ryan wrote:
>> I too migrated to Zimbra for more or less the same / similar reasons.
>> One of the mail reasons for me migrating was that email has changed
>> too dramatically over the last five years, with special consideration
>> to storage and storage management. Offering 1.5m users 1Gb+ mailboxes
>> cost effectively could never be possible with qmail-ldap. It was a
>> good qmail-ldap 6 years while it lasted though.
>>
>>
>
>
> Hello Ryan,
>
> I was wondering why do you state that Qmail-LDAP is no longer cost 
> effective in terms of storage, for systems with a big number of users and 
> big mailboxes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugo Monteiro.
>
> -- 
> fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
>
> Hugo Monteiro
> Email : [email protected]
> Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
> Web      : http://hmonteiro.net
>
> Divisão de Informática
> Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
>    Universidade Nova de Lisboa
> Quinta da Torre   2829-516 Caparica   Portugal
> Telefone: +351 212948596   Fax: +351 212948548
> www.ci.fct.unl.pt       [email protected]
>
> fct.unl.pt:~# _
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.