Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.ldap
Organization Complexo Pequeno Príncipe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02-02-2010 20:01, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Claudio et al,
> 
> For some time now i've been wondering if there are
> any plans to enhance Qmail-LDAP in a near future.
> 
> Some improvements that come to my mind regard the
> possibility to adopt some anti-spam solutions into
> the code tree, ipv6 support, LDAP code rewrite to
> be compliant with the latest OpenLDAP API and changes
> in the build process to be able to lower the
> dependencies of binary code on the build host.

	Just out of curiosity, are you also considering
a move to FHS? Which means, leave behind the /var/qmail?
:-)


> With the release of Qmail code into the public domain,
> by DJB over two years ago, i was also wondering if
> there are plans to start releasing Qmail-LDAP as a
> standalone project, to be distributed as whole solution,
> and not just as a patch for Qmail.

	We are deploying a new infra for MTA and we
again decided to use qmail-ldap (that wins for a short
margin over exim). It is still the smartest to deal
with LDAP and without being, ahmm... Zimbra. :)


	BTW, let me also public thank you Claudio and
Andre (and other qmail-ldap contributors) for their
great work.  It would be great to see improvements and
new features in qmail-ldap.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]>
Tecnologia da Informação (TI) - Complexo Pequeno Príncipe
http://www.pequenoprincipe.org.br/    T: +55 41 3310 1747
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=9DjX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.