Re: Future of Qmail-LDAP

Ibrahim Harrani <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.qmail.ldap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I wonder, am I only the one who is experiencing this problem?
Is there anyone has the same problem?


Thanks.


On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ibrahim Harrani
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In this qmail test, CPU idle was almost zero.  CPU time was mostly used by
> system.
>
> In the same test, if you set max connection to 100/200 via tcpserver and
> don't change anyhing in xstress side(still opening 600 connection).  The
> load is quite low. So I decided that the reason is forking many qmail-smtpd
> ?
>
>
>
>>
>> CPU load has not realy much todo with how busy a system is. It is possible
>> to have a cpu load of 1000 without even noticing it. It just means that
>> there are more processes ready to run.
>>
>> --
>> :wq Claudio
>>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.