Re: domain keys

I tried the solution at http://www.memoryhole.net/qmail/#dkim a few weeks 
ago with net-qmail. While it works properly, the Perl DKIM signing functions 
are very CPU intensive and may not be suitable unless you only have a fairly 
low volume of mail that needs to be signed. Russ Nelson's qmail-dk patch 
offers much better performance, but unfortunately it only handles Domain 
Keys and not DKIM. There are C++ libraries for DKIM  at 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libdkim/ so it may be possible to modify 
qmail-dk or create a similar patch to support DKIM as well.

J.T.


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Hugo Monteiro" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 5:13 AM
To: "Russell Simpkins" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: domain keys

> On 03/12/2010 09:58 AM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
>> On 03/12/2010 03:58 AM, Russell Simpkins wrote:
>>> Anyone,
>>>
>>> I've been looking at domain keys and dkim. I'm running qmail-ldap and 
>>> can't find much chatter on domain keys. It does not appear that there is 
>>> support for domain keys or dkim in qmail-ldap - or am I wrong. Does 
>>> anyone have any pointers?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>
>>
>> IIRC the only available patches for DKIM or DomainKeys are for stock 
>> qmail. But it shouldn't be too hard to adapt for qmail-ldap...
>>
>> R's,
>>
>> Hugo Monteiro.
>>
>
>
> To answer my own post, there is an implementation that apparently can be 
> done without patching. Please check http://www.memoryhole.net/qmail/#dkim
>
>
> R's,
>
> Hugo Monteiro.
>
> -- 
> fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
>
> Hugo Monteiro
> Email : [email protected]
> Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
> Web      : http://hmonteiro.net
>
> Divisão de Informática
> Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
>    Universidade Nova de Lisboa
> Quinta da Torre   2829-516 Caparica   Portugal
> Telefone: +351 212948596   Fax: +351 212948548
> www.fct.unl.pt                [email protected]
>
> fct.unl.pt:~# _
>
>