Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!

Tomas Kuliavas <[email protected]> escribió:
> No. I suspected that unoptimized antivirus setup might be slowing things
> down. My suspect was qmail-scanner and undaemonized clamav or
> spamassassin. I am not familiar with kaspersky queue performance. Used it
> once ages ago and then replaced with simscan or qmail-scanner.

I will do some test changing the mailflow, for check if "bottleneck"  
is the KAS or KAV.

>> This is my rbllist file:
>>
>> #      baseaddress     action    matchon   Message
>> #==========================================================================
>> #      sbl.spamhaus.org reject    127.0.0.2 See
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
>> #        bl.spamcop.net addheader 127.0.0.2 See http://spamcop.net/
>> bl.spamcop.net reject 127.0.0.2 See http://spamcop.net/
>> zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.2 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
>> zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.3 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
>> zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.10 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
>> zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.11 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL
>
> CBL/XBL is deliberately excluded? IMHO it has higher hit rate in spamhaus
> RBL.

I have added it now. At the moment, CBL is blocking many spam. Thank you.

> Can you check how fast your spamhaus DNS lookups are and maybe consider
> running local RBL? Spamhaus offers 30 day trial, if you want to check how
> local RBL would affect your email performance.

I will consider it, I don't knew this possibility.

Thank you very much.