Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Carlos García Gómez <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:30:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.qmail.ldap |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fundación Integra |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I don´t use GFS either NFS or GFS. I have one Hardware balancer with three nodes-MTAS. Each node has one SAN partition mounted but all nodes see all partitions, so, each node has presented all partitions. The idea is that if a node crashes, the other node assumes the identity of the fallen and mount his SAN partition with /var/qmail/control/ldapclusterhost attribute. Obviously I have scripts that automate all that. Regards. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Carlos García Gómez Sistemas de Información y Comunicaciones Fundación Integra. http://www.f-integra.org Teléfono: +34 968 355161 Fax: +34 968 355131 Correo: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje y los posibles documentos adjuntos al mismo son confidenciales y dirigidos exclusivamente a los destinatarios de los mismos. Si por un error de transmisión, o equivocación en la dirección de envío, usted ha recibido este mensaje y no es el destinatario de la información, por favor, notifíqueselo al remitente y borre este mensaje, sin usar, informar, distribuir, imprimir, copiar o difundir el mensaje, total o parcialmente, por ningún medio. Gracias. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ibrahim Harrani To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:25 PM Subject: qmail-ldap and GFS Hi, Currently, my domains and users are distributed to different mailhosts in my qmail ldap cluster. In this setup, If I one of the mailhost is down, the users can't access to mailbox on this server. To setup a redundant system, I would like to keep mailbox on GFS file system with multiple backends. All backends will share the same GFS partition. There will be one mailhost entry in openldap entries and load balancer to distrube pop3/imap and smtp connections to backends. If one of the backend is down, this will not effect the users. But, I have some doubts about locks and I/O issues. Can you please share your experience about this kind of setup? Thanks